Nice work. One thing many people are missing here is (1) the quantity of cDNA/EV/plasmid is very high. It should max out at 3 per 1000 RNA (by weight) according to EMA and international standards, but this is looking to be about 1:2 so about 300 per 1000. Having that much plasmid DNA injected into you is really bad - but it gets worse.
The body can normally eradicate plasmid DNA because it's foreign and the DNAases get to work. But this is wrapped in a fluffy LNP transfectant medium, so will get to every cell that the LNP touches. It will transfect the nucleus of those cells, no problem.
So now you have active EV/plasmid DNA in a LNP available to either produce huge quantities of RNA (because that's what they are there for) or else integrate into the genome - which will happen during cell division even in the absence of a specific integrase enzyme.
The quantity available is the deal breaker because it is now present in the same magnitude of amount as the RNA. They might as well have injected the self-amplifying RNA version that they wanted to from the beginning.
Bear in mind that this analysis is just the bivalent, so it's possible that this was a deliberate contamination knowing that there would be no meaningful QA on the product after the regulators completely failed to do any on the original product.
Mar 14, 2023·edited Mar 14, 2023Liked by ClownBasket
I'd like to say: I think my stupid stoned ass tried to sign into your account by just clicking stuff. I was trying to sign into my account and subscribe. If you get some kind of notification about an attempted login, it's me accidently clicking the wrong stuff. I was not paying much attention and just hit a sign in button from your page, then used my email. Now I have a "sign into clownbasket" email sitting in my trash bin. Super duper sorry, and no reason to freak. Idk who you are but I am just here for the dumbed down version of Kevin's stuff because I don't have time to understand everything he wrote, I promise. Pls forgive me, super duper sorry. I don't use substack well, or often. I've only signed in a few times so I haven't paid much attention to the process
Mar 14, 2023·edited Mar 14, 2023Liked by ClownBasket
Awesome work! Thank you. I love it when people do this (with images!) because it makes it so much easier and faster for me to get the ideas out for a wider audience on social media.
Easier to say "Houston we have a major problem and here's why..."
Also Eureka! Thanks for mentioning Dr VSK! Her interview is the most shared link I've posted on Twitter and what earned my first account @Janieyaya permanent suspension in 2021. I STILL point people to that interview, as it seemed highly predictive then and now prescient. Thanks for your hard work explaining the complex genetics science. I'm suspended @ssayssayssay again on Twitter but will put this out on the other sm sites. Keep going!!
I actually understood 95% of this. Thank you! There's another part I don't understand...and I guess it's because I thought we already knew the vax caused autoimmune or inflammatory conditions and cancer. I don't understand why this is different. Anything by Kevin was very hard to understand as well.
The Pfizer jabs have an "acceptable" upper limit of 12.5 EU/ml which is known to be Lethal in some unfortunate Jabbees. Pfizer won't release individual Endotoxin measurements in different Lots or Batches. We do know they had at least large production run that exceeded the limit.
My understanding is an origin of replication in a bacterial plasmid allows for replication in bacterial cells but not human cells. For replication in human cells you need a human origin of replication. Perhaps you can check this as this is not my field.
As for integration this has been studied with DNA vaccines. The conclusion as I recall was that integration frequency was typically less than your DNA’s spontaneous mutation rate by up to 3 orders of magnitude. Of course, FDA requires integration studies for DNA vaccines, something Pfizer does not due as DNA is assumed to be negligible
Keep in mind most cells transfected are killed by immune cells, which is enhanced by the interferon response the dsDNA induces
The question is why is the circular DNA resisting linear linearization by the restriction enzyme and why is the DNA (circular of linear) resisting DNase degradation.
How is it possible to use 2 different plasmids (diff expression vectors) in one lot. Does Pfizer have multiple sources of plasmids (Agilent is one source that was recruited in 2021 suggesting there are at least 2)? Even them my understanding is each batch from a 37.5 L vat has its own unique lot number.
Has anyone checked the Lot numbers against VAERS to see if they are hot lots?
Thank you for breaking this down. I understand it now. Is this why some of the vaccine injured continue to get worse? Because their body sees their cells as foreign and attacks them? I’m also curious about different batches. We know that some batches had more lipids in them? Is it possible that some batches had more of the bacteria plasmids?
Why is Clownbasket pro-test if the tests are garbage? The primers were created in the absence of a sample. If you don’t understand that the testing is fraudulent, you don’t know much-?
Do those plasmid DNA fragments generate bacterial/viral peptides that will attract immunity or activate T killer cells? Are they immunogenic? What will happen if they are integrated into the genome of cells? Will those cells get killed off?
Great stuff! You beat me to the compendium of how to make a shit-ton of mRNA. Still gonna write it up though. :)
Nice work. One thing many people are missing here is (1) the quantity of cDNA/EV/plasmid is very high. It should max out at 3 per 1000 RNA (by weight) according to EMA and international standards, but this is looking to be about 1:2 so about 300 per 1000. Having that much plasmid DNA injected into you is really bad - but it gets worse.
The body can normally eradicate plasmid DNA because it's foreign and the DNAases get to work. But this is wrapped in a fluffy LNP transfectant medium, so will get to every cell that the LNP touches. It will transfect the nucleus of those cells, no problem.
So now you have active EV/plasmid DNA in a LNP available to either produce huge quantities of RNA (because that's what they are there for) or else integrate into the genome - which will happen during cell division even in the absence of a specific integrase enzyme.
The quantity available is the deal breaker because it is now present in the same magnitude of amount as the RNA. They might as well have injected the self-amplifying RNA version that they wanted to from the beginning.
Bear in mind that this analysis is just the bivalent, so it's possible that this was a deliberate contamination knowing that there would be no meaningful QA on the product after the regulators completely failed to do any on the original product.
Thank you for this. One question, are you still pro vax??
Amazing writeup!!
I'd like to say: I think my stupid stoned ass tried to sign into your account by just clicking stuff. I was trying to sign into my account and subscribe. If you get some kind of notification about an attempted login, it's me accidently clicking the wrong stuff. I was not paying much attention and just hit a sign in button from your page, then used my email. Now I have a "sign into clownbasket" email sitting in my trash bin. Super duper sorry, and no reason to freak. Idk who you are but I am just here for the dumbed down version of Kevin's stuff because I don't have time to understand everything he wrote, I promise. Pls forgive me, super duper sorry. I don't use substack well, or often. I've only signed in a few times so I haven't paid much attention to the process
Awesome work! Thank you. I love it when people do this (with images!) because it makes it so much easier and faster for me to get the ideas out for a wider audience on social media.
Easier to say "Houston we have a major problem and here's why..."
Also Eureka! Thanks for mentioning Dr VSK! Her interview is the most shared link I've posted on Twitter and what earned my first account @Janieyaya permanent suspension in 2021. I STILL point people to that interview, as it seemed highly predictive then and now prescient. Thanks for your hard work explaining the complex genetics science. I'm suspended @ssayssayssay again on Twitter but will put this out on the other sm sites. Keep going!!
I actually understood 95% of this. Thank you! There's another part I don't understand...and I guess it's because I thought we already knew the vax caused autoimmune or inflammatory conditions and cancer. I don't understand why this is different. Anything by Kevin was very hard to understand as well.
Very helpful thankyou, this helps cement my understanding from the original Anandamide article.
Jessica also helped to show how bad this could be.
A big thank you for breaking down this technical material for us laymen.
Could the reason why Ivermectin works for Covid be that the circular DNA is from bacteria, and Ivermectin acts on bacteria?
Did someone mention E coli Endotoxins?
The Pfizer jabs have an "acceptable" upper limit of 12.5 EU/ml which is known to be Lethal in some unfortunate Jabbees. Pfizer won't release individual Endotoxin measurements in different Lots or Batches. We do know they had at least large production run that exceeded the limit.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/endotoxins-in-pfizer-jabs-mimic-nickel
Interesting.
My understanding is an origin of replication in a bacterial plasmid allows for replication in bacterial cells but not human cells. For replication in human cells you need a human origin of replication. Perhaps you can check this as this is not my field.
As for integration this has been studied with DNA vaccines. The conclusion as I recall was that integration frequency was typically less than your DNA’s spontaneous mutation rate by up to 3 orders of magnitude. Of course, FDA requires integration studies for DNA vaccines, something Pfizer does not due as DNA is assumed to be negligible
Keep in mind most cells transfected are killed by immune cells, which is enhanced by the interferon response the dsDNA induces
The question is why is the circular DNA resisting linear linearization by the restriction enzyme and why is the DNA (circular of linear) resisting DNase degradation.
How is it possible to use 2 different plasmids (diff expression vectors) in one lot. Does Pfizer have multiple sources of plasmids (Agilent is one source that was recruited in 2021 suggesting there are at least 2)? Even them my understanding is each batch from a 37.5 L vat has its own unique lot number.
Has anyone checked the Lot numbers against VAERS to see if they are hot lots?
Thank you for breaking this down. I understand it now. Is this why some of the vaccine injured continue to get worse? Because their body sees their cells as foreign and attacks them? I’m also curious about different batches. We know that some batches had more lipids in them? Is it possible that some batches had more of the bacteria plasmids?
Why is Clownbasket pro-test if the tests are garbage? The primers were created in the absence of a sample. If you don’t understand that the testing is fraudulent, you don’t know much-?
Do those plasmid DNA fragments generate bacterial/viral peptides that will attract immunity or activate T killer cells? Are they immunogenic? What will happen if they are integrated into the genome of cells? Will those cells get killed off?
Thank you, slowly getting my head around the basics of something that is so complex